Doctoral f2f Annual Review Schedule

TCR PhD annual reviews: February 25, 2011

Room 357

Time	Student	Chair	Member	Member	Member
9:00	Bacon	Baehr	Kemp	Rickly
10:00	Brandenburg	Rickly	Baehr	Carter
11:00	Wery	Kemp	Baehr	Rickly
12:00	Christofides	Kemp	Baake	Zdenek
1:00	Wang	Barker	Baake	Dragga
2:00	Watson	Carter	Baake	Koerber
3:00	Beaudin	Rice	Lang	Booher
4:00	Bennett	Lang	Barker	Booher	Late in day

Room 358

Time	Student	Chair	Member	Member	Member
9:00	Crane	Still	Cargile-Cook	Barker
10:00	Jahnke	Still	Dragga	Cargile Cook
11:00	Krahmer	Still	Baake	Cargile Cook
12:00
1:00	Trice	Still	Zdenek	Booher
2:00	Trauth	Rice	Booher	Lang
3:00	Huston	Zdenek	Barker	Koerber
4:00	Barron	Rice	Koerber	Carter

Annual reviews (TBA), 2011

meetings by arrangement, by March 1 (MOO, WebCam, Phone, etc.)

Notes	Student	Chair	Member	Member
Out of town	Visconti	Still	Rice	Kimball
Just did quals	Ray	Baehr	Kimball	Carter
Out of town	Rasberry	Zdenek	Rice	Eaton
Working on diss	Sharpe	Carter	Baake	Barker
Out of town	Pohland	Kimball	Baehr
Out of town	Zobel	Still	Zdenek	Booher
To be arranged	McKenzie	Dragga	Carter	Kimball

 

 

TCR PhD annual reviews: March 4, 2011

Room 357

Time	Student	Chair	Member	Member	Member
9:00
10:00	Schafer	Eaton	Baake	Rice
11:00	Latham	Eaton	Still	Baake
12:00	Mellon	Eaton	Baehr	Booher
1:00	Edgell	Eaton	Baake	Dragga	afternoons
2:00
3:00

 

Advertisements

Annual Review Schedule Set

Please mark your calendars for your doctoral annual reviews:

Overview and instructions, Jan 29th, 9:00 – 10:00

Annual reviews: Feb 12 and Feb 19

Times for the 2 days of annual reviews will depend on faculty and student availability. If you have particular limits, please let me know. I’ll have room numbers and specific times on the 29th.

Please see http://www.english.ttu.edu/tcr/phdtcr/annualreview.asp for our program’s policies.

The Graduate School catalog (http://www.depts.ttu.edu/officialpublications/catalog/GradDoctoral.php) says the following about our requirements to conduct annual reviews:

Annual Review. The Graduate School strongly encourages faculty in each doctoral program to conduct a formal review of their students’ progress at least once each year. From the third year onward, such review is required. Any student not making satisfactory progress may be placed on probation and given conditions to meet to stay in the program. Continued unsatisfactory progress in any area of a student’s work will be cause for dismissal.